Fifty targets in a single minute. Which one is the real threat, and what should engage it? PVOGuard answers before the crew can read the list — and proves why.
Current air defence systems fail at target triage under saturation. The capacity of both human decision-making and traditional C2 nodes is exceeded.
The attacker deploys a massive swarm of cheap UAS and decoys. The sensor network and the C2 node face a target overload that exceeds the capacity of traditional batch processing and human assessment.
A compressed engagement window and human decision latency break the OODA loop: the decision matures after the moment it was needed. The attacker thereby forces an asymmetric cost exchange.
Once fire resources are depleted, the actual kinetic threat penetrates. The defence fails through an inability to triage in time, not through a lack of firepower. The attacker wins by economic saturation.
PVOGuard sits between sensors and effectors. It never takes the trigger — it sorts, prioritises and recommends.
Conventional systems assess the picture in batches. PVOGuard treats every return as its own event and computes continuously — on a budget of a few milliseconds.
A decoy can mimic a drone, but it cannot fly like one. Micro-kinematics of the track separate the decoy from the real threat before an interceptor is wasted on it.
A safety node watches civilian zones and holds absolute veto. Every step — machine and human alike — is written into a cryptographically chained log that cannot be rewritten.
We will walk you through a full run, from the first return to the sealed decision record.
Book Tech Demo